When Genre Fiction Goes Literary

[pameladlloyd]

I knew there was a reason, beyond simple pique, that I disliked seeing genre fiction being marketed as mainstream or literary fiction. Now Kit Whitfield, discussing Saki and Angela Carter's writings about werewolves, in her article "The Story of the Werewolf" in the farewell issue of The Journal of Mythic Arts explains why this is a bad thing for genre fiction.

Saki and Carter are too good to fiddle around with — they stand alone, and elaborating on them seems rather pointless. Besides this, they have both managed the trick we sometimes witness in non–mainstream writing: an author writes a story, in a certain genre, and produces something so well–crafted and intelligent that people end up not thinking of it as a member of that genre at all, but rather as a literary work, which happens to include elements of a particular genre but, as it were, rises above them. Write a good enough genre story, and it doesn't get considered genre. It's a self–perpetuating trend, because if all the best works get officially sublimated out of, say, the horror category, then what's left are the less advanced works, and any author who writes another good horror story will be likewise sublimated out of a kind of critical courtesy, so as not to confound him with the works that have officially failed to transcend their genre and remain just plain horror, romance, or whatever. With all the best examples labelled [sic] as something else, a genre's reputation sinks, ambitious and innovative writers start to avoid it, and it remains publicly perceived as trashy, even when there's no artistic reason why it should be.

What do you think? Is it bad for genre fiction when all the best works are labeled something else? Or does it help the status of the genre to have works that might otherwise be categorized as genre fiction be labeled as literary fiction?

Comments

[mmegaera.livejournal.com]

If you think SFF is derided, try writing romance [g]. Seriously. And I think you're right about the literary/academic thing. It all reminds me of that movie with Michael Douglas a few years ago -- Wonder Boys, that was it. He played a professor who'd written one novel that did really well, and couldn't write another one to save his life.

[pdlloyd.livejournal.com]

I'll bet. :)

I's funny, I can remember reading a number of books as a kid, when I'd graduated to the adult shelves, that had what I'll call a romance ethic, since I've no idea now who wrote them or how they were categorized. But, I didn't have any awareness of them as romance novels, per se. So, later, when I ran into the more, er, overt type of romance, I became guilty of forming a negative opinion of the whole genre. (Even as I was annoyed by people who criticized my favored genres.) It was only later that I realized how hypocritical I was being. My favorite romances, by and large, have been cross-overs (even before this was common), but there's one romance book with no fantastical elements, Too Deep for Tears by Kathryn Lynn Davis that I found extremely moving.

One thing I like to remember, when people fuss over reading choices, is that just by being a reader at all, of anything, we are only ten percent of the total population. To the extent that we value reading, then, being a reader of any kind, regardless of whether we have a preferred genre, means that we're engaging in a valued activity.

[mmegaera.livejournal.com]

As a former librarian, I'll quote from one of our gurus: "Never apologize for your reading tastes." Betty Rosenberg wrote several readers advisory (aka helping people find new books to read) books on genre fiction, and ran up against rather more snobbery than most people do on the subject in a lifetime.

Hey, at least you realized you were being a hypocrite. A lot of people never quite see the irony in their complaints about people dissing their genre.

I'll have to see if I can find a copy of Too Deep for Tears.

[pdlloyd.livejournal.com]

Thanks. :)

Since I didn't have the book in my hands, I looked it up on Amazon to get the author's name. If you can't find it elsewhere, you can find it there.