Today
watermelontail posted
this story about
a statement made by Michael Goldfarb on John McCain's website as reported by BoingBoing, and referenced
kadath's take on the matter in
this post. Since the McCain statement links to
an article on the Daily Kos and mentions "liberal bloggers at the Daily Kos," I hopped on down to
Daily Kos to see what all the fuss was about.
Basically,
rickrocket over on
Daily Kos stated that a story McCain told about a cross scratched in the dirt by a guard "sounded so fake and so contrived" that
rickrocket felt compelled to research it. He found another story in which a cross is scratched in the dirt among Alexander Solzhenitsyn's writings. He strongly implies that McCain's story may be a retelling of Solzhenitsyn's and points to a
NY Sun article by John McCain that shows McCain admires Solzhenitsyn's work, but he doesn't come right out and say that McCain cribbed the story.
Now, despite the fact that I have played role-playing games, I haven't got a clue about the general political leanings of D&D players, or of paper role-playing gamers in general. So I don't know if
Mr. Goldfarb's barb was correct. But, I will point out that had his post simply refuted the claim, without attempting to denigrate those "liberal bloggers at the Daily Kos," he probably wouldn't have received
the scornful reply they posted,
BoingBoing wouldn't have focused on the way he dissed D&D gamers, and the story spreading around the blogosphere like wildfire would be a very different one, possibly even one that looks at the original suggestion of plagiarism.
The real question is, does this hurt, or help McCain's campaign. And I have no answer to that one.